Posted in: Musicouching by chris73 on April 29, 2009 | 5 Comments
Once again something too much for the US – it was 1969.
The release of that album (Polydor Records U.K/Canada, Atco Records U.S.) provoked controversy because the cover featured a topless pubescent girl, holding in her hands a silver space ship designed by Mick Milligan, a jeweler at the Royal College of Art. Some perceived the ship as phallic. That was too much for the U.S. and orders were quickly cancelled. A quick reprint had the back cover photo (see below) of the band on the front, the naked girl banished from sight. Within a week of the change, the album was a gold record.
Image via Wikipedia
The cover art was created by photographer Bob Seidemann, a personal friend and former flatmate of Clapton who is known primarily for his photos of Janis Joplin and the Grateful Dead. Bizarre rumors both fueled and were fueled by the controversy, among them that the young girl was Baker’s illegitimate daughter or, alternatively as a fantasy, was a groupie kept in the meadowlands as a slave by the band members!
Actually, the young girl was a London suburbanite, Mariora Goschen. Seidemann wrote that he approached a girl reported to be 14 years old (Sula Goschen) on the London Tube about modeling for the cover. Later he met with her parents, David and Angela Goschen, at their home in Mayfair, finding them wealthy, distantly related to royalty, friendly with Allen Ginsberg and with Bohemian sympathies. They gave their consent, but in the end, it was Sula’s 11-year-old sister, Mariora, who posed. She asked for ‘a young horse’ as payment but instead received 40 pounds from Stigwood, Clapton’s management organisation. “The nudity didn’t bother me. I hardly noticed I had breasts. Life was far too hectic. I was mad about animals and much taken up with family and friends. But now, when people tell me they can remember what they were doing when they first saw the cover, and the effect it had on them, I’m thrilled to bits. By the way, I’m still waiting for Eric Clapton to ring me about the horse.” Said many years later Mariora.
Sula had been proved too shy and also old for the effect Seidemann wanted. He wrote: “I could not get my hands on the image until out of the mist a concept began to emerge. To symbolize the achievement of human creativity and its expression through technology a space ship was the material object. To carry this new spore into the universe innocence would be the ideal bearer, a young girl, a girl as young as Shakespeare’s Juliet. The space ship would be the fruit of the tree of knowledge and the girl, the fruit of the tree of life”….”I called the image “Blind Faith” and Clapton made that the name of the band”
One other interesting note about the cover is that it was nameless, only the wrapping paper told the buyer who the artist was and the name of the album. According to Seidemann, “It was Eric who elected to not print the name of the band on the cover. This had never been done before.” In fact, this had been done previously for The Rolling Stones 1964 debut album, Traffic’s self-titled 1968 album, and The Beatles’ albums Rubber Soul (1965) and Revolver (1966).
Though initially banned in the U.S. the original artwork was quite popular and collectible. Also became available later in the 1970’s on the RSO label worldwide, and in the USA as a “JEM” import item.
See also:
chris73 April 29th, 2009 at 7:10 am
The controversial picture censored by the site. If someone is courious it is not difficult to find it atound internet.
C Jordan April 29th, 2009 at 8:13 am
The imsge can be found at
http://sleevage.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/blind_faith.jpg
I put this because this is another example of American medis double standards. I put an aricle out about a civil rights song and they published a picture of two dead bodies hanging from a tree. Yet even though this article has an intellectual and art content they put a twist to it and will not publish the picture at the centre of the controversy. (?)
As a 14/15 year old in the UK I bought this album, not because of the cover but because it was a new album for a much lauded new Supergroup, bringing together Eric Clapton, Rick Grech, Ginger Baker and Steve Windwood.
My take on the whole issue at the time? The cover was disapointing because it was only a kid when it could have been a woman, and while there were one or two good tracks on the album, that too I found disapointing.
Good article Chris.
kate smedley April 29th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
I learned something new, thank you, love music articles, very informative, keep it up!
nutuba May 6th, 2009 at 4:47 am
Enjoyable and informative writing! I’ve heard bits and pieces of Blind Faith but didn’t know any of this history. Nicely done!
clay hurtubise May 8th, 2009 at 7:48 am
Interesting! The US is so ‘body’ phobic!
Thanks,
Clay